2) Most importantly, H335 is unlike most all other powders in that it gets very nasty when loaded beyond listed data for your bullet. thanks. for 55 gr bullets. And it seems to have less carbon build up in side the guns I shoot it in. I have tried Tac and it sucked for me with accuracy. Page / 14 Next Page. H335 H322 MR2000 AA2015 IMR4895 V133 V135 TAC Within this group how do we rate them. This spherical powder originated as a military powder and is perfect for the 5.56 NATO/223 Remington. As a fine extruded powder, it flows through powder measures with superb accuracy. NVGdude Replies: 14 Views: 323 1/18/2021 10:32 PM nigla Previous Page. Just wondering what y'all have experienced with H322.. Up until now, I have either loaded bulk with H335 or BLC-2 and 55-62gr bullets, or Varget with weight sorted LC brass. Hodgdon H335 Smokeless Powder- 8 Lbs. 6.5 Grendel 85gr Sierra HP loaded to 2.240". Any insight from you guys on the 2 powders would be appreciated. Since their premier in 1946, Hodgdon powders are trusted and offer premium match-grade accuracy. As for the H322, with any regular 55gr boat tail, Hodgdon's data shows a 23 grain max load. Matchkings. Surprisingly H322 meters better than W748 and just as well as H335, if that has any meaning to you. im shooting a cva stalker single shot in 45-70 govt for hunting purposes. Varget features small, extruded grains for uniform metering, is insensitive to hot and cold temperatures and produces higher energy for improved velocities over other powders in its burning-speed class. As far as metering, H335 is like water. Mar 12, 2018 #11 2.200 in. Spitzer C.O.A.L. Just wondering if you guys have a preference. I believe this is due in part to it being extruded and h335 being a ball powder though I shoot nickel groups at a hundred yards with this powder in my 5.56 AR so I am not saying it is an inferior powder at all. They may have appropriate data for your cartridges in their ... May have to get a pound to try in the 35 was try to find something between 4198/RE7 and H335 to experiment with . I'd start at 23 and work up .2 .4 .6 or .7. In Italia, l'Istituto Superiore di Sanità ha fatto sue queste indicazioni, redistribuendole in sue pubblicazioni.. Multiple applications in the 222 Remington and other varmint cartridges. Just wondering if you guys have a preference. NVGdude. I'm currently using Ramshot X-Terminator for both .223 and 6.8 loads. It's just something you'll have to try for yourself to see if your rifle likes it or not. H322 provides match-grade accuracy in small- and medium-capacity cartridges like the 223 Remington, 6mm PPC and the 7mm TCU. I see no reason H335 wouldn't work fine. and 8 lb. Hodgdon H322 Smokeless Powder- 8 Lbs. H322 is a little faster than h335 and outperforms it on almost every test I have performed from distances as little as 50yds. 25 VihtaVuori N320 75 Hodgdon H322 125 Accurate Arms 3100 26 Accurate Arms No. The .223 caliber has evolved from the battlefield AR-15 platform to popular sporting use in varmint and predator hunting, match competition, and all-around plinking fun. Paddyd. My Cooper M21 Phoenix .204 likes H322 at 27.0 grns. The powder ignites quickl My Horn book claims 25.3 to 29.5 with a 95 to 100 pill. Where is the best place to start? I'm a "find one good powder that works for everything" kind of guy and I see H322 and H335 in loadings for 223, 308 and 7.62x39. 29.5 gr. Reactions: 1raggedhole. Almost forgot, but for some reason I have noticed that H322 heats my barrel up much fast than H335 loads. Local Cabela's has 1# of h4198 that I can get today for testing this coming week but rather not waste the $ if there's no minimal advantage over h322. 300 Blackout Powders. As a fine extruded powder, it flows through powder measures with superb accuracy. 28.5 gr. Min Charge Max Charge Optimal Charge Bullet Make Bullet Type Primer Notes; Hodgdon - Benchmark: 90 gr. I have got used to loading the 69gr. And both H322 and W748 meter very well. It's time to test more powders with Bobs' Bulk 55gr bullet in 233/5.56. CT10ring. (HAZMAT Fee Required) Price $228.99. SKU: H3351. Thanks all! HPBT C.O.A.L. which 3 shall I pick? Take this with a grain of salt and they used an Alexander Arms 14 1/2" barrel and 7 1/2 twist. Le indicazioni di pericolo H (Hazard statements), contenute all'interno del Regolamento (CE) n. 1272/2008, rappresentano indicazioni di pericolo relative a sostanze chimiche.. For me, H335 meters better in my 650 than H322 does. Mar 8, 2018 #10 My 12 LRPV does it's best with 32's using H4895 . 30.5 gr. Out of stock. Prairie dog shooters will find this a favorite, as J.B. Hodgdon has for years! Benchmark is slower than H322. Im getting ready to load up some lighter grain bullets for one of my AR-15 builds. Shop at Reloading Everything for Hodgdon powders at low prices. Hornady BTHP for my AR that has a 1-7 Twist with a WOA bbl. Hodgdon H335 Smokeless Powder- 1 Lb. Hodgdon distributes both powders. It looks like H322 is a little faster with lower recommended charge weights. 2 76 Accurate Arms 2015BR 126 VihtaVuori N160 ... 32 Hodgdon UNIVERSAL 82 Hodgdon H335 132 Alliant Reloder 22 33 IMR Co IMR UNEQUAL 83 Ramshot X-Terminator 133 VihtaVuori N560 2.135” #1727 .264” 123 gr. I still have a 8 pound keg i am loading ball plinking rounds only with now. After computing it, 23.7 grains offers 100% case fill and is still 5000 psi under NATO pressure loads. I've loaded about 15,000 rounds using H335 and about 5,000 rounds using H322. I see hodgdon as a few powders listed, but alas what I've got is Benchmark. SKU: H322-8. Mar 8, 2018 #9 Both powders are very accurate. My preferrred powders inthe .223 are N135, N140, Varget, and H335. Powder Bul Weight C.O.L. H335 also has a smaller flash signature over H322. H335 meters better, Benchmark is much more temp tolerant . SKU: H3358. Available in 1 lb. This Extreme series powder has likely won more benchrest matches than all other propellants combined. (HAZMAT Fee Required) Price $29.99. Hodgdon H380 Smokeless Powder- 1 Lb. H322 provides match-grade accuracy in small- and medium-capacity cartridges like the 223 Remington, 6mm PPC and the 7mm TCU. Hornady BTHP and 68gr. Trying some new target bullets out 100 Yards for load development. With IMR 4064 and both my Mosin-Nagants and .308 Savage 99 the results were O.K., but nothing to brag about. Wanting to be able to hopefully get my powder dropper dialed and throw a consistent charge that will keep me in my accuracy node, hence the fine grain H322. and 8 lb. Quit chasing velocity and exceeding Max load data for H335 loads as H335 will return you damage to your gun and maybe you, too. I use h322 and h335 for 223rem rounds and see on hodgdons website its compatible with 45-70 lever actions. has anyone used h335 and h322 for 45-70? Wc844 Vs H335 iͳ & U8߈J⃽' wc x l ] T P | T y _ a n . Available in 1 lb. Clean Burning / ease of metering I will pick 3 powders and buy a pound of each and see what my 2 AR's like and also my Mossberg MVP. Out of stock. I do know I have had very good luck with it in mid size cases and light bullets. VARGET Varget is an extruded propellant in the Hodgdon line of Extreme series of powders. Silver $$ Contributor. I'm currently using Ramshot X-Terminator for both .223 and 6.8 loads. I like H335 better than H322 because its cleaner. Reloading for the .223 is easy and there are a number of great powder choices. LDBennett If I was going to stock 2 powders for 223 and 308 it would be H335 and 8208 XBR. There are a lot of hits online for 23 offering decent results which seem to make forum posters happy. ratbuster. Ive tested 10 drops repeatedly, weighing, and dividing out. It looks like I could go with either H322 or H335 for both calibers, and probably load with less grains for the same amount of velocity with H322 (according to the Sierra, Speer and Hornady data I … 07-31-2016, 04:54 AM #6. Im using WC844 pulldown powder (I believe its very close to H335) which is a very fine powder. If you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck! It is unique in this regard, according to this article. With Varget I have managed to get decent groups for all my .30 caliber rifles, but nothing spectacular. (HAZMAT Fee Required) Price $199.99. Ok, this is a bit of a stretch, but here goes anyway. But I do like H322 over H335 for 6.8 spc. 8208 XBR is not quite as good, but seems to be under a .1 grain on a 10 drop test. H335. containers. 25.6 to 27.3 with a 120 to 123. SMK, 75gr. containers. The Hodgdon Reloading Data Center (RDC) lists 21 different powder types that can be used in the .223. Charge difference - Grove vs. no grove SWC. No more than .05 variance in drops from a Hornady powder measure. H335 23.8 24.9 26.0 27.1 27.7 28.2 H4895 23.4 24.5 25.5 26.5 27.1 Varget 24.4 25.5 26.6 27.7 Energy/ft.lbs 1204 1322 1445 1573 1639 1707 1776 #1720 .264” 120 gr. Pat It looks like I could go with either H322 or H335 for both calibers, and probably load with less grains for the same amount of velocity with H322 (according to the Sierra, Speer and Hornady data I looked at). Hard to believe that with all the experience and knowledge here nobody has some h322 vs h4198 input. to 750yds. I would like to use it because I use it already and one less powder to mess with. For .223, I like the H335 more. Out of stock. SMK, 77gr.